Next year is going to bring a lot of big changes to the X-Men franchise. For the most part this strikes me as
being for the best; the X-Men
franchise has been more or less running in place since X2 with a major emphasis on the less. Despite this series lasting for well over a decade the
visual emphasis is still on black leather plastic, Wolverine is still king of
the party, and the X-Men’s whole existence is still solely defined by fighting
to protect a populous that hates them.
It bugs me because so much of that is just the drabbest iteration of
these characters. Hence why I’m
really welcoming the changes that will come with X-Men: Apocalypse. The
costumes are imaginative and vibrant, the conflict vast and not just rehashing
previous tensions, and it marks the beginning of the end for Wolverine’s role
in the franchise. However, with
the series most recognizable actor and character finally bowing out of the
spotlight Fox needs a new face for the franchise going forward. That’s where Channing Tatum’s Gambit comes in.
So far, aside from that no one has really known what to
expect from Channing Tatum’s Gambit. It’s obvious Fox wants this to be a
touchstone for the X-Men going
forward as it will be the first film in the wake of X-Men: Apocalypse’s major recasting and continuity reboot but
otherwise we’ve been fairly in the dark.
However, over the weekend the first details about the film have started
to slip through in the form of a casting break down. So far none of these characters seem to be drawn from the
expansive X-Men canon or even the weird collection of mythos behind Gambit’s
character. The big take away from
the list is more about the film’s prospective genre. It looks like Fox is shooting to make something in the vein
of a crime or heist movie first and foremost as a lot of the character
descriptions fall into the style of con-artists, thieves, and other sundry
criminals. The only exception is a
mysterious Louis who’s described as an appealingly elegant but secretly dark
entrepreneur just in case you were wondering who the film’s villain was going
to be.
This isn’t that surprising of a development. We’ve been living in a post-Marvel
world for a while now and that is the most true of Fox. After all it was Avengers massive success that convinced Fox to do such a major cash
infusion for the team-up event of Days of
Future Past so Fox trying to follow up on the Marvel promise of cross-genre
superhero stuff is a logical next move.
The casting break down does make it seem like this will be more of a
serious film than an action comedy but I hope that’s not the case. Channing Tatum has proven himself a
strong dramatic actor in stuff like Fox
Catcher but overall it’s clear his strengths remain grounded in comedy work
more than anything else. What’s
more it’s hard to imagine how a movie about a Cajun superhero thief with an
outrageous accent and the power to make playing cards explode could be done in
a serious manner.
Still, as I said, it’s early days yet with a lot of time for
tone and story to shift over the coming months. This is especially true given how convoluted and
non-adaptation friendly Gambit’s mystic thief back-story is in the comics. His origins and solo material is
generally so unwieldy that’s almost a given that the creators will have to whip
up a whole new mythos for the films.
It’s a broad canvas to paint on given the film will also stand as the
first major piece of continuity post-Apocalypse
but going in a stripped down, small scale crime direction seems like a good
call. And at the very least it’ll
probably be better than Taylor Kitsch’s version of the character from Wolverine Origins.
No comments:
Post a Comment