In case my various previous articles weren’t enough of an
indicator I am a massive and unapologetic Star
Trek fan. I was first
introduced to the franchise through the serviceable if not terribly great 2009
reboot movie but since then I’ve made my way through all the films, nearly all
the shows (still not done with Enterprise,)
Star Trek: Online, and several
interesting EU novels. However,
being a fan is a double edged sword because it means I’ve developed a sense of
what I want Star Trek to be, a
definition informed more by my own personal likes and ideas about the various
series rather than strict adherence to canon. For instance, I think Star
Trek should be driven by character drama and emotion above all else but
that doesn’t change the fact the original series was predominately informed by
setting up occasions for flights of insanity, wrestling, sword fights, and
laser battles.
So going into the trailer for Star Trek Beyond I’m more than a little hesitant to jump on the
proclamations of whether this IS or ISN’T Star Trek. After all, my own definitions of what Star Trek IS have
changed significantly over my time as a fan so it’s not like there’s a hard and
firm definition and at the same time the question of definition is ultimately
secondary to the question of quality.
So, while I will talk about the Trekkiness of this trailer eventually
for now my question is; is it any good, to which the answer is a resounding
“not really.”
I’m actually a little perplexed as to why this trailer is as
unappealing as it is but I think the central reason is that it feels a lot like
I’ve been handed a warmed up plate of 2014’s leftovers and expected to be wowed
by it because it was different from 2013’s leftovers. Seriously, this movie seems to have exactly two major points
it wants to make, firstly that “this is not Into
Darkness,” which I admit is a plus given that Into Darkness was a dour confused mess of a film with a real dearth
of creativity of ambition. The
second big point is “this is Guardians of
the Galaxy,” which I think is where the trailer is losing me because as
much as I like Guardians of the Galaxy
I didn’t really want any more of it.
To be clear I’m not saying I didn’t want a sequel because
I’m looking forward to seeing what obscure Marvel Arcana Starlord and friends
bumble into when 2017 rolls around but that’s because I’m psyched to see those
same characters interact with something new. In the case of Star
Trek Beyond it feels a lot like the very paper thin characters that have
been established for the 2009 Star Trek crew are being twisted and reshaped to
fit into the mold of retreading the superficial elements of Guardians of the Galaxy without the
emphasis on eclectic sense of humor and mostly unrestrained creativity. That’s why this trailer is so keen to
make its showy, anachronistic needle drop in the opening and quickly ditch the
Enterprise and slot the crew into monochromatic leather jumpsuits.
Now that approach has always felt decidedly cheap and small
and more in line with a sci-fi TV show than a movie, even for Guardians given
that a lot of their roughneck aesthetics felt more culled from Firefly and Farscape than Star Wars
or Fifth Element. However, where Guardians buoyed its
production value, scope, and imagination with an emphasis on big, crazy, showy
concepts like quasi-mystic cosmic rocks that can destroy planets and a talking
raccoon and his ent friend, Star Trek
Beyond looks to be going in the opposite direction; smaller, cheaper,
slicker and less ambitious.
I’m not sure if the more stripped down visual aesthetic of
both the costume and set design is meant as a deliberate homage to the original
series, as the basic plot of “ship inoperable so let’s screw around on the
planet till the 40 minute mark” is very much an original series mark but it’s
really not working for me. Like
with the other stuff this goes back to imagination, scope, and what’s driving
the plot more than anything else.
TOS had “trapped on planet” episodes all the time but the planets were
populated by giant lizard men, Mugatos, unkillable cowboy sheriffs, or
historical figures summoned to fight by rock babies.
This trailer doesn’t have anything even 1/10th as
imaginative, just a very lame looking repackaging of the Jem’hadar. Conversely, Next Generation and Voyager
had their fair share of slow burn, small scope planet stories but they were
informed entirely by character identity and emotion like in Generations. What we’ve got here is something with the stripped down
scale of TNG “let’s discuss ethical views on this planet” story mixed with the
pacing and inflated sense of importance of a TOS “let’s fight ancient Greek
Gods in space” story. The last
time Star Trek tried this it gave us Insurrection,
the objective worst film in the series.
Now to be clear I’m not saying Star Trek Beyond WILL be this bad, just that the trailer isn’t
doing it any favors in terms of the film being presented. However, to be fair, the movie on
display here doesn’t look as bad as Insurrection,
mainly because Justin Lin is a much better action director and even at his
least he seems to have come up with a handful of interesting stunts to throw
together for this trailer sizzle reel.
Given how far out the film is I’m willing to bet we’ll see some more
impressive action as time goes buy given that any Star Trek film requires a quite heroic amount of CGI work and that
all gets done in post-production but what we do see is pretty cool I certainly
admit.
I like the transporter stunt at the end and the idea of an
enemy ship swarm that can puncture the shields and hull of the Enterprise is a
pretty cool concept. Kirk on the
motorcycle is a bit of a hard pill to swallow but that’s more about Chris Pine
in the role than the stunt itself and mainly that his smug, cocky, alpha-bro
affectation has just never sat well in the role of Captain. One thing that does strike me is that
despite spending an entire film giving Carol Marcus a back-story and purpose on
the Enterprise she’s nowhere to be seen in this trailer.
I realize this is the big, splashy premiere trailer meant to
appeal to the mass audience flocking to Star
Wars: Force Awakens this Friday so judging the overall intentions and
themes of the final product is a stretch game but something that’s decidedly
off-putting about this trailer is how much it falls into the same trap as the
last two films in the Star Trek
reboot. Specifically, even more
than “this is not Into Darkness” or
this is Guardians of the Galaxy,” the
message this film is trying to send is “this is not Star Trek,” the same message of the last two films and a pretty
backwards place to approach the material from.
This is the same problem that’s afflicted a lot of modern
reboots of classic franchises, the series plagued by an inability or
unwillingness to carve out a singular identity beyond riding the coat tails of
the most popular recent entry into their particular genre. It’s the same issue that impacted the
Daniel Craig Bond films as they flittered from trend to trend with mixed levels
of success.
Star Trek has
always had a touch of the populist and event he derivative in its narrative DNA
right down to the start when it was pitched as a blend of the popular westerns
for the ‘50s with the burgeoning genre of speculative fiction and pulp sci-fi. Wrath
of Khan was thoroughly informed by the success of Star Wars compared to Star
Trek: The Motion Picture’s lack of an audience hence the major emphasis on
space fighting and action. Even in
the modern era, the most enduring achievement of the Next Generation years was
creating the Star Trek version of Terminators with the Borg.
What I’m saying is that I’m not inherently opposed to Star Trek trying to evolve to the time
and integrate populist elements into its new entries, I’m opposed to that being
the film’s only goal or guiding element.
All the examples I mentioned were still contributing some measure of
originality whether it was the unfiltered psychedelic imaginings of the
original series, the Shakespearean drama of Wrath
of Khan, or the philosophy of utopia that has always elevated TNG’s Borg
stories. It’s possible Star Trek Beyond is building up to a
much more interesting story, especially given Idris Elba has yet to appear in
this trailer and his line about “the frontier pushes back” was decidedly
evocative but for right now I don’t see an original vision for Star Trek under
all the borrowed identities and populist coat tail chasing.
if you liked this article please like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter
if you liked this article please like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment